Credit Risk interview prep.

The credit officer is the bank's independent gatekeeper: the RM brings the deal and the borrower's story, and the credit officer re-underwrites cash flow + leverage + downside, sets the risk rating, signs (or declines) at delegated authority, or defends the recommendation at credit committee.

What interviewers look for

  • Can the candidate re-underwrite the RM's deal independently, cash flow, leverage, coverage, downside, and form a money-good view they will defend?
  • Do they set a risk rating they can defend. PD / LGD / EAD reasoning tied to financials + structure + sector, not gut feel?
  • Do they structure for downside, covenants (financial + negative), security, MAC clause, so the bank gets early signals + leverage if the credit slips?
  • Do they spot early warning + classify the credit on time. Special Mention / Substandard / Doubtful, and own the allowance impact under CECL / IFRS 9?
  • Are they portfolio + concentration aware, sector concentration, vintage, cycle stage, and the leveraged-lending / SR-letter posture?
  • Will they hold the line at credit committee, dissent when warranted, decline when the deal doesn't clear, without breaking the RM relationship?

Behavioural questions to expect

  1. Walk me through your CV.

    What it tests: Story coherence + genuine fit for the independent credit seat. Tests whether the candidate can land on credit risk as the deliberate next step, analytical rigor + downside-first instinct + the willingness to hold the line, not a default from a banking or analyst path.

  2. Tell me about the most difficult credit call you've owned.

    What it tests: Substance over polish. Tests whether the candidate has actually formed and DEFENDED an independent view, a downgrade, a decline, a dissent, an early-warning escalation, not just supported one. Quantitative detail (facility size, leverage, rating change, EL) and ownership signals matter.

  3. Tell me about a weakness, a failure, or feedback you've received and worked on.

    What it tests: Self-awareness + credit discipline + ability to take a real critique. Fake weaknesses downgrade immediately. Credit-risk mistakes sit on the balance sheet for years; honesty about a judgement error and the process fix matters more here than in most seats.

  4. Why credit risk, and why this seat vs the RM / origination side?

    What it tests: Authentic fit for the independent, downside-first credit seat, vs the RM origination side (deal flow + cross-sell), vs market risk (mark-to-market), vs buy-side credit (security picking). Tests whether the candidate genuinely wants the independent view and the holding-the-line role.

  5. Which segment or sector would you want to cover, and why?

    What it tests: Genuine fit + grasp of how the credit picture changes across segment + sector. Tests whether the candidate has a reasoned preference (middle-market / large corporate / sponsor finance / a sector vertical) rather than a random one.

  6. Why this firm?

    What it tests: Whether the candidate has done the homework. Bar: firm-specific evidence on the credit organisation, the risk culture, the rating framework, the portfolio mix, and recent performance, not generic 'great bank'.

  7. How would you describe this firm's credit culture and risk framework in your own words?

    What it tests: Whether the candidate has internalised HOW the bank runs credit, independent credit organisation, rating framework, delegated authority, portfolio appetite, not just 'they have a credit team'. Tests whether they've read the disclosures + supervisory record.

  8. How does a commercial bank actually make, and lose, money on credit?

    What it tests: Whether the candidate understands the bank's credit economics: NII on the loan minus funding cost, minus expected loss, minus operating cost, against allocated capital, and that the loss side (charge-offs + allowance build) drives the cycle outcome more than the spread.

Technical concepts to master

Independent credit review + the RM-vs-credit tension

Independent re-underwrite
Rebuild the cash-flow walk from the borrower's financials, form an independent leverage + coverage view, and stress the downside, not summarise the RM memo.
Delegated authority + credit committee
Credit officers sign at a delegated lending limit; deals above the limit go to credit committee for joint approval by senior credit + sometimes the CRO / CEO.
RM-vs-credit tension
RMs are measured on revenue + new business + cross-sell; credit is measured on PD / LGD / EL discipline + classified-asset trend. The tension is structural, not personal.
Dissent + escalation
If credit disagrees with the RM's recommendation, the dissent is documented in the memo and escalated to chief credit; if unresolved, the deal goes to a higher committee.

Risk rating + PD / LGD / EAD / EL framework

PD (Probability of Default)
The 1-year probability the borrower defaults; tied to the borrower's financial profile, sector, and cycle. Banks calibrate PD to internal grades + external rating equivalents.
LGD (Loss Given Default)
The expected % loss on the exposure if the borrower defaults, net of recoveries. Driven by lien position, collateral coverage, and liquidation value.
EAD (Exposure at Default)
The expected exposure at the moment of default; for revolvers, includes drawn balance + a credit conversion factor (CCF) on undrawn commitments.
EL = PD x LGD x EAD
Expected loss; the building block for pricing (RAROC), allowance (CECL / IFRS 9), and economic capital. Computed at facility level + aggregated to portfolio.

CECL / IFRS 9 + allowance mechanics

CECL, current expected credit loss
FASB ASC 326 (US): lifetime expected credit loss recognised on every credit from origination, updated each period for forward-looking macro forecasts.
IFRS 9, three-stage expected credit loss
International standard: Stage 1 (12-month EL on origination), Stage 2 (lifetime EL on significant increase in credit risk, SICR), Stage 3 (lifetime EL on credit-impaired, equivalent to non-performing).
Allowance build + reserve release
Period-over-period change in allowance flows through the P&L as provision expense; rating downgrades + classification migrations + macro forecast deterioration build reserves; upgrades + improving macros release.
Qualitative overlays + management adjustments
Additions to the model-driven allowance for factors the model misses: sector concentration, late-cycle credit risk, novel risks (e.g. office CRE post-2020), portfolio uncertainty.

Portfolio + concentration risk

Concentration limits
Named limits on single-name (% of capital), sector, geography, sponsor / counterparty, vintage, leveraged-lending, and high-risk product categories.
Vintage + cycle posture
Loans booked at the same vintage share macro + underwriting standards; late-cycle vintages typically carry higher loss content as underwriting drifts.
Leveraged-lending guidance + supervisory limits
US interagency guidance (2013) on leveraged lending: borrower leverage > 6.0x, weak structure, or non-pass-through cash flow, banks expected to apply tighter underwriting + report exposure.
Stress testing + capital
Internal stress (idiosyncratic + macro) + regulatory stress (DFAST / CCAR for $100bn+ banks) project losses + capital under moderate + severe scenarios.

Covenant breach + classification path

Covenant breach + cure
Maintenance covenants test every period; breach triggers a default unless cured (replacement EBITDA, equity cure, principal paydown) or waived / amended by the lender.
Amendment / waiver, never for free
On a trip, the bank trades forbearance for value: tighter covenants going forward, additional reporting, incremental collateral or guarantees, an equity injection, repricing (e.g. +25-100bps), and an amendment fee.
Classification migration
On a breach or deterioration, the credit migrates along the Pass / Special Mention / Substandard / Doubtful / Loss ladder; classification drives PD / allowance + supervisor attention.
Workout / special assets
On structural deterioration or default, the credit transfers from the RM portfolio to a workout / special-assets group with restructuring + recovery mandate.

Practical drills

  • A 5-year senior secured term loan of $50m to a strong non-IG borrower: internal rating maps to a 1-year PD of 1.5%, LGD of 35% (senior secured with ~70% collateral coverage), and EAD of $50m (term loan, fully drawn). Pricing is S+275 with a 1% upfront fee. Allocated capital is 8%. Operating cost 100bps. (a) Compute expected loss. (b) Compute RAROC. (c) Does it clear a 12% hurdle? If not, what would change your view?
  • The RM brings a deal: $40m senior secured term + revolver to a sponsor-backed middle-market industrial at 4.2x leverage, 2.1x ICR, cov-lite + springing leverage at 5.0x; pricing S+325. The RM recommends approval at an internal grade equivalent to BB-. Walk me through how you'd render an independent view + how you'd handle it if you disagreed at committee.
  • A $30m middle-market borrower (manufacturing) graded internal-BB just reported Q3 EBITDA down 25% YoY due to a key-customer loss + raw-materials margin compression; the leverage covenant of <=3.75x will be tripped at year-end (currently 4.1x LTM). Walk me through (a) the early-warning triage, (b) the classification call, and (c) the allowance impact.

Smart-question anchors

  • Credit organisation + culture - independent credit reporting, delegated authority, RM-vs-credit balance
  • Rating framework + methodology - grade ladder, PD / LGD / EAD calibration, model governance
  • Portfolio + concentration - sector limits, leveraged-lending posture, cycle stage view
  • Allowance + cycle - CECL / IFRS 9 methodology, recent classified-asset + provision trend
  • Stress + capital - internal stress, DFAST / CCAR positioning, capital + risk-appetite link

Related roles

Sourced from

Ready to Generate Your Own Prep?

Drop your CV and a job description on the home page. A couple of minutes later you get a report with everything you need to land the job.

Generate my first prep