Walk me through your CV.

What it tests: Story coherence + genuine fit for credit. Funds value leveraged-finance / restructuring / credit-research exposure, evidence the candidate is drawn to the capital structure and downside, not equity-style upside stories.

Tell me about your most impressive credit or restructuring analysis.

What it tests: Depth of capital-structure literacy + willingness to take a recovery-weighted view. Tests whether the candidate priced a credit, not just described a company.

Tell me about a weakness, a failure, or feedback you've received and worked on.

What it tests: Self-awareness + downside humility. Cross-role canonical. Fake weaknesses downgrade immediately. Credit punishes optimism, analysts who under-weight the downside lose money asymmetrically.

Why credit / distressed? Why not equity long/short?

What it tests: Authentic interest in credit vs cycling buy-side recruiting. Tests whether the candidate is drawn to the capital structure, downside protection, and documents, not equity-style upside.

What it tests: Whether the candidate has done the homework. Bar: firm-specific evidence from sub-strategy, where in the structure the firm plays, recent situations, and people.

Why {performing / stressed / deep-distressed} credit, or why a {single-manager / multi-manager pod} platform, over the alternative?

What it tests: Whether the candidate understands the structural trade-offs and has made an informed choice, not just chasing the first offer.

How would you describe this firm's credit process and edge in your own words?

What it tests: Whether the candidate has internalized HOW the firm makes money, sourcing, diligence, where in the structure it plays, not just WHAT it owns.

How do you think this firm manages risk on a single credit and at the book level?

What it tests: Whether the candidate understands the asymmetric credit payoff, limited upside to par, real downside to recovery, and that liquidity and mark-to-market matter in distressed. Probed hardest at pod platforms.

Front Office Investing interview prep.

Part credit analyst, part bankruptcy lawyer, part probability-weighted trader.

What interviewers look for

Does the candidate think in the capital structure? The question is which tranche to own, at what price, not whether the business is 'good'.
Can they price a credit, cents on the dollar, yield-to-worst, recovery-in-default, and frame the asymmetry, not just narrate a story?
Do they read the documents? Covenants, security, guarantees, and intercreditor terms decide recoveries; the edge is in the credit agreement, not the press release.
In distressed: can they find the fulcrum, run a recovery waterfall under absolute priority, and reason the path (out-of-court vs Chapter 11, DIP, debt-for-equity)?
Do they have downside discipline? Recovery-in-default is the floor; credit is an asymmetric payoff (limited upside to par, real downside to recovery).
Intellectual honesty + process literacy, creditor dynamics, who holds what, and how a restructuring actually plays out, not just the bond price.

Behavioural questions to expect

Walk me through your CV.
What it tests: Story coherence + genuine fit for credit. Funds value leveraged-finance / restructuring / credit-research exposure, evidence the candidate is drawn to the capital structure and downside, not equity-style upside stories.
Tell me about your most impressive credit or restructuring analysis.
What it tests: Depth of capital-structure literacy + willingness to take a recovery-weighted view. Tests whether the candidate priced a credit, not just described a company.
Tell me about a weakness, a failure, or feedback you've received and worked on.
What it tests: Self-awareness + downside humility. Cross-role canonical. Fake weaknesses downgrade immediately. Credit punishes optimism, analysts who under-weight the downside lose money asymmetrically.
Why credit / distressed? Why not equity long/short?
What it tests: Authentic interest in credit vs cycling buy-side recruiting. Tests whether the candidate is drawn to the capital structure, downside protection, and documents, not equity-style upside.
Why this firm?
What it tests: Whether the candidate has done the homework. Bar: firm-specific evidence from sub-strategy, where in the structure the firm plays, recent situations, and people.
Why {performing / stressed / deep-distressed} credit, or why a {single-manager / multi-manager pod} platform, over the alternative?
What it tests: Whether the candidate understands the structural trade-offs and has made an informed choice, not just chasing the first offer.
How would you describe this firm's credit process and edge in your own words?
What it tests: Whether the candidate has internalized HOW the firm makes money, sourcing, diligence, where in the structure it plays, not just WHAT it owns.
How do you think this firm manages risk on a single credit and at the book level?
What it tests: Whether the candidate understands the asymmetric credit payoff, limited upside to par, real downside to recovery, and that liquidity and mark-to-market matter in distressed. Probed hardest at pod platforms.

Technical concepts to master

The credit pitch, the scaffold

The instrument + price: The specific tranche (1st lien / 2nd lien / unsecured / sub), its price in cents on the dollar, and its yield / YTW.
Thesis + stress level: Why it's mispriced, and whether it's performing-with-upside, stressed (~80-90 cents), or deep distressed.
Recovery-in-default (the floor): Where you sit in the waterfall and your estimated recovery if the company defaults, your downside floor.
Catalyst + timing: What re-rates the credit, refinancing, earnings inflection, asset sale, ratings action, or a restructuring event.

Credit metrics + bond math

Leverage + net leverage: Total Debt / EBITDA (gross); subtract cash for net leverage. The headline indebtedness gauge.
Coverage (interest + FCCR): EBITDA / interest (interest coverage); EBITDA / fixed charges (FCCR). Can the company service its obligations?
Price in cents + yield: Bonds trade as a percent of par (cents on the dollar); yield and YTW move inversely to price.
Maturity wall + liquidity: When debt comes due and whether the company can refinance or fund it; the most common trigger of distress.

Covenants + the documents

Maintenance vs incurrence covenants: Maintenance covenants are tested every period; incurrence covenants only bite when the company takes an action (new debt, a dividend).
Security + guarantees: What assets secure the tranche and which subsidiaries guarantee it; unsecured / non-guaranteed debt is structurally subordinated.
Restricted payments + baskets: Covenant carve-outs that permit dividends, new debt, or asset transfers up to defined 'basket' capacities.
Liability management (priming / drop-down / uptier): Aggressive moves that subordinate existing lenders, priming new debt, dropping assets into unrestricted subs, or uptiering some lenders over others.

Capital structure priority + recovery + fulcrum security

The waterfall, senior to junior: Distribution order in default / reorg: super-priority / DIP → first-lien secured → second-lien secured → senior unsecured → subordinated → preferred → common equity.
Recovery rates, directional norms: Recovery = value received / face claim. Senior secured typically recovers 60-80%, senior unsecured 30-50%, subordinated 10-25%, equity 0% in most reorgs.
Fulcrum security: The most senior tranche that recovers ONLY PARTIALLY, where value breaks. The layer above recovers in full; the layer below recovers little or nothing.
Going-concern vs liquidation EV: Going-concern EV: business reorganized as a going entity, valued at a multiple of normalized EBITDA. Liquidation EV: assets sold for parts (collateral coverage, receivables, real estate).

The restructuring toolkit

Out-of-court vs Chapter 11: Out-of-court (amend-and-extend / exchange) is faster and cheaper but needs high creditor consent; Chapter 11 binds holdouts via the plan and cramdown.
DIP financing: Debtor-in-possession financing, new super-priority money funding the company through Chapter 11.
Debt-for-equity swap: Creditors exchange impaired debt for equity in the reorganized company, the core deleveraging mechanism.
Loan-to-own / distressed-for-control: Buy the fulcrum (or soon-to-be-fulcrum) debt cheaply intending to convert it into control of the reorganized equity.

Practical drills

Pitch me a credit in the firm's sub-strategy, name the tranche, the price in cents, and why. 5 min prep, 5-7 min delivery. Be ready to be probed for 10-15 min on recovery, covenants, and downside.
A company has $600m EBITDA, $3.0bn total debt, $200m cash, and $360m annual interest expense. (a) Gross and net leverage? (b) Interest coverage? (c) Its senior unsecured bonds trade at 72 cents, what does the price plus these metrics tell you about stress and likely recovery focus?
A distressed company has a going-concern EV of $1.2bn. Capital structure (par): $700m first-lien term loan, $600m senior unsecured notes, $250m subordinated notes, then equity. Distribute the value under absolute priority. What recovers what, and which is the fulcrum?

Smart-question anchors

Sourcing, where the firm's credits come from (new issue, secondary, stressed, restructurings) and how an analyst contributes
Where in the structure the firm plays, senior / fulcrum / across the spectrum, and the target return for each
Restructuring + activism, whether the firm takes active-creditor / loan-to-own roles and how it staffs the legal / process work
Risk + downside discipline, single-name caps, recovery loss budgeting, liquidity / mark-to-market discipline; a recent example
Analyst autonomy + PM partnership, how much an analyst's recovery view drives sizing and the book; the path to running risk

Sourced from

Ready to Generate Your Own Prep?

Drop your CV and a job description on the home page. A couple of minutes later you get a report with everything you need to land the job.

Generate my first prep