Advisory Services interview prep.

Has staffed and managed transaction services, valuation, and restructuring engagements; has interviewed associate candidates across deal advisory practice lines.

What interviewers look for

  • Does the candidate know WHICH advisory practice they're interviewing for + can they describe its analytical toolkit accurately? (Generic 'advisory' answers are downgraded.)
  • Can they walk a transaction or engagement with the right shape, engagement objective, their role, analytical work, finding, client outcome? (Bottom-up storytelling is the analyst trap.)
  • Do they have the foundational accounting + finance (three statements, EBITDA bridges, DCF mechanics) to be deployable on day one without senior-staff hand-holding?
  • Are they commercially curious, do they think about why a buyer would care about a QofE finding, or why a CFO wants a valuation, vs treating analysis as an end in itself?
  • Can they communicate with clients, advisory associates draft sections of client deliverables in week one + sit in management meetings within months?
  • Are they realistic about deal cycles + the 60-70 hour weeks during live deal phases (vs busy season's predictable Jan-Apr peak in audit)?

Behavioural questions to expect

  1. Walk me through your CV / resume.

    What it tests: Story coherence + advisory fit. Interviewers screen for a path that lands on advisory as a deliberate choice, analytical depth + commercial curiosity + a specific practice interest, rather than a 'I want consulting-ish work but I don't know which kind' default.

  2. Tell me about your most impactful project or accomplishment.

    What it tests: Substance over polish + top-down communication (recommendation / outcome first, then support). Advisory associates draft client-deliverable sections in their first month; top-down framing is the early signal of deployability.

  3. Tell me about a weakness, a failure, or feedback you've received and worked on.

    What it tests: Self-awareness + the ability to take real critique without deflecting + evidence of behavioural change. Advisory teams reject candidates whose only weakness is 'I work too hard' or 'I'm a perfectionist', these signal an inability to self-assess honestly.

  4. Why advisory? Why not audit, tax, banking, or strategy consulting?

    What it tests: Whether the candidate can articulate the specific trade-off they're making. Advisory sits at the intersection of accounting depth + transactional / strategic work, interviewers want to hear the candidate explain why THIS lane vs the obvious adjacent options.

  5. Why {advisory practice} specifically? (e.g. why Transaction Services vs Valuation vs Restructuring?)

    What it tests: Whether the candidate has thought through the practice-level distinction. TS / Val / Restructuring / Risk / Tech are distinct practices with distinct day-to-day, distinct toolkits, distinct deal cycles. Candidates who treat them interchangeably get downgraded.

  6. Why this firm?

    What it tests: Whether the candidate can distinguish this firm's advisory practice from its 2-3 closest competitors. Generic 'great brand' answers downgrade within 15 seconds.

  7. What do you think makes this firm's practice distinct?

    What it tests: Firm + practice-specific homework. Interviewers probe for substantive differentiation beyond marketing.

  8. What does day-to-day life look like for an associate in this practice?

    What it tests: Whether the candidate has realistic expectations about advisory life, deal cycles, live-deal hours (60-70/week), travel patterns, downtime between projects. Different from audit's predictable Jan-Apr busy season.

Technical concepts to master

Three financial statements, connections you'll be probed on

Income statement (IS) overview
Profitability over a period. Revenue → COGS → Gross Profit → OpEx → EBITDA → D&A → EBIT → Interest → EBT → Tax → Net Income.
Balance sheet (BS) overview
Snapshot at a point in time. Assets (current + non-current) = Liabilities (current + non-current) + Shareholders' Equity.
Cash flow statement (CFS) overview
Cash movement, grouped by operating / investing / financing.
Statement connections, the canonical question
How the three statements link: Net Income flows from IS to CFS (operating) and to Retained Earnings on BS. D&A flows from IS to CFS (add-back) and reduces PP&E on BS. CapEx flows from CFS (investing) and increases PP&E on BS. Change in debt flows from CFS (financing) and updates liabilities on BS. Change in cash from CFS updates cash on BS.

Financial due diligence, how a Quality of Earnings actually gets built

Quality of Earnings (QofE) build
Reconcile reported EBITDA to a normalized run-rate EBITDA the buyer can rely on by adjusting for one-time, non-recurring, owner-related, accounting-policy, and pro-forma items.
Net Working Capital peg
Compute the normalized monthly NWC the business needs to operate; average it (typically over 12 months); set as the target / peg the seller must deliver at close. Deviation at close adjusts purchase price dollar-for-dollar.
Debt-like items + cash-like items
At close, the equity purchase price = enterprise value − debt-like + cash-like ± NWC adjustment. Debt-like items reduce equity proceeds; cash-like items increase them.
EBITDA bridge
Reported EBITDA → adjusted EBITDA, shown as a waterfall: starting figure + each adjustment category labeled, signed, and quantified, ending at adjusted EBITDA used for valuation.

Valuation toolkit. DCF, comps, transactions, PPA

Discounted cash flow (DCF)
Project unlevered free cash flows over the explicit forecast period (typically 5-10 years), apply terminal value at end, discount everything back at WACC; sum gives enterprise value.
Comparable companies (trading comps)
Identify peer set of public companies similar in business model, size, growth, profitability; apply observed market multiples (EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue) to subject company's metric to derive value range.
Precedent transactions
Identify completed M&A transactions of similar companies; apply observed deal multiples (EV/EBITDA or EV/Revenue at deal) to subject company. Captures control premium.
Purchase Price Allocation (PPA). ASC 805
After an acquisition, allocate purchase price to identifiable assets + liabilities at fair value; residual is goodwill. Subject to ongoing impairment testing (ASC 350).

Restructuring + 13-week cash flow

13-week cash flow forecast
Weekly cash receipts − weekly cash disbursements = net weekly cash movement; rolling 13-week forward forecast shows liquidity trajectory + identifies cash-out or covenant-breach points.
Liquidity runway + minimum cash
Liquidity = cash + revolver availability; runway = weeks until liquidity hits minimum operating cash level (the floor below which the company cannot pay critical obligations).
Capital structure waterfall + priority of claims
In restructuring or liquidation, claims are paid in priority order: secured debt (by collateral) → super-priority admin / DIP → unsecured debt → trade creditors → preferred equity → common equity.
Covenant analysis + fixed-charge coverage
Test the company's compliance with debt covenants: typically leverage (debt/EBITDA), fixed-charge coverage (EBITDA / (interest + principal + capex + taxes)), and minimum liquidity. Breach triggers default and acceleration risk.

Practical drills

  • A company has enterprise value of $500M, total debt of $120M (including $20M of finance leases), cash of $35M, accrued bonus liability of $8M, and a tax refund receivable of $5M. Compute the equity value the seller would receive at close. Walk me through it.
  • You're staffed on the buy-side QofE for a $50M EBITDA software company. The CFO has told you reported EBITDA is $52M for the last twelve months. Walk me through how you'd build the QofE adjustments and set the NWC peg.
  • A regional retail chain with ~$300M revenue is approaching covenant breach. Current cash is $15M, revolver availability is $25M. The CRO has hired the firm to build a 13-week cash flow and identify liquidity actions. Walk me through how you'd build the model and what you'd flag.

Smart-question anchors

  • Practice-line scope + deal mix in the candidate's preferred sector over the next 12-18 months
  • Associate ramp + first-year deliverable ownership, when do associates own a workstream end-to-end
  • Industry specialization vs generalist staffing, how the practice handles early-career sector development
  • Recent landmark deal or engagement, ask about dynamics behind one publicly-cited engagement
  • Exit-pattern reality, where associates go after 2-4 years (corporate development, PE, in-house transactions)

Related roles

Sourced from

Ready to Generate Your Own Prep?

Drop your CV and a job description on the home page. A couple of minutes later you get a report with everything you need to land the job.